翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Fisher School-High Street Historic District ・ Fisher Scientific ・ Fisher separation theorem ・ Fisher Site ・ Fisher Spur ・ Fisher state by-election, 2014 ・ Fisher Stevens ・ Fisher Strait ・ Fisher Studio Houses ・ Fisher test ・ Fisher Towers ・ Fisher Township, Fremont County, Iowa ・ Fisher Township, Polk County, Minnesota ・ Fisher transformation ・ Fisher Tull ・ Fisher v Bell ・ Fisher v. Dees ・ Fisher v. University of Texas ・ Fisher Wallace Laboratories ・ Fisher West Farm ・ Fisher Youngster ・ Fisher's angelfish ・ Fisher's Big Wheel ・ Fisher's equation ・ Fisher's exact test ・ Fisher's Field ・ Fisher's Folly ・ Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection ・ Fisher's geometric model ・ Fisher's ghost Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Fisher v Bell ： ウィキペディア英語版 Fisher v Bell ''Fisher v Bell'' () 1 QB 394 is an English contract law case concerning the requirements of offer and acceptance in the formation of a contract. The case established that, where goods are displayed in a shop together with a price label, such display is treated as an invitation to treat by the seller, and not an offer. The offer is instead made when the customer presents the item to the cashier together with payment. Acceptance occurs at the point the cashier takes payment. ==Facts== The Defendant displayed a flick knife in the window of his shop next to a ticket bearing the words "Ejector knife – 4s." Under the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959, section 1(1), it was illegal to manufacture, sell, hire, or offer for sale or hire, or lend to any other person, amongst other things, any knife "which has a blade which opens automatically by hand pressure applied to a button, spring or other device in or attached to the handle of the knife". On 14 December 1959, the Claimant, a chief inspector of police force, brought forward information against the Defendant alleging the Defendant has contravened section 1(1) by offering the flick knife for sale. This loophole was closed by Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1961 〔( Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1961 )〕 Ban on Flick Knives: which inserted after the words “offers for sale or hire” the words “ or exposes or has in his possession for the purpose of sale or hire”." 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Fisher v Bell」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.